Skip to content

Tarea 2 de 4 del Listening

Sentence completion del Listening B2 First: audio y respuestas

Descárgalo en el App StoreGratis, para iPhone y iPad

Lee las 10 frases, dale al play y escribe en cada hueco lo que oyes. Al pulsar "Corregir" se aceptan todas las formas válidas (12 o twelve, 40% o forty percent) y ves la frase exacta del audio que da cada respuesta.

You will hear a marine biologist talking about her work in wildlife conservation. For questions 1-10, complete the sentences with a word or short phrase. You will hear the recording twice.

0:002:42
  1. 1Dr Chen has been working in marine conservation for approximately years.
  2. 2Before working with coral reefs, Dr Chen's original research focused on .
  3. 3A coral fragment may need up to to be ready for transplanting.
  4. 4The process in which corals turn white due to warm water is called .
  5. 5Government grants have been cut by almost in the last ten years.
  6. 6The team runs programmes where volunteers can participate in diving trips.
  7. 7The team now uses fitted with cameras to survey coral reefs efficiently.
  8. 8The team is experimenting with to build artificial reef structures.
  9. 9Fish numbers near restored reefs in Indonesia have risen by in five years.
  10. 10A has agreed to change its routes to protect the conservation areas.
0 de 10 contestadas. Lo que dejes en blanco cuenta como fallo.
Transcripción del audioMejor después de corregir: si la lees antes, ya no estás escuchando.

Good afternoon everyone. My name is Dr Sarah Chen, and today I'd like to talk to you about my work in marine wildlife conservation, specifically focusing on coral reef restoration.

I've been working in this field for about twelve years now, ever since I completed my PhD at the University of Plymouth. My initial research was actually on seabird populations, but I switched to coral reef ecology after a visit to the Great Barrier Reef in 2013 completely changed my perspective.

So, what exactly does coral reef restoration involve? Well, essentially, we grow fragments of healthy coral in underwater nurseries, and then transplant them onto damaged reefs. It sounds straightforward, but in reality, it requires enormous patience. A single coral fragment might take up to three years to grow large enough for transplanting.

One of the biggest challenges we face is rising ocean temperatures. When the water gets too warm, corals expel the algae living in their tissues, which causes them to turn white — a process known as bleaching. We've found that some coral species are more resistant to temperature changes than others, and we're now focusing our efforts on cultivating these hardier varieties.

Funding is another significant obstacle. Our primary source of income comes from government grants, but these have been reduced by nearly forty percent over the last decade. To compensate, we've started running what we call 'citizen science' programmes, where paying volunteers join us on diving expeditions. This serves a dual purpose: it generates income, and it also raises public awareness of the issues facing our oceans.

The technology we use has evolved dramatically. When I started, we relied mainly on manual underwater surveys, which were incredibly time-consuming. Now we use underwater drones equipped with high-resolution cameras to map large areas of reef in a fraction of the time. We've also recently begun experimenting with 3D printing to create artificial reef structures that mimic the natural ones.

In terms of results, I'm cautiously optimistic. At our main project site in Indonesia, we've seen a thirty-five percent increase in fish populations around the restored areas over the past five years. That's a really encouraging sign because it suggests the ecosystem is beginning to recover.

Looking ahead, I believe the key to long-term success lies in collaboration. No single organisation can solve this problem alone. We need governments, scientists, local communities, and the private sector all working together. I'm particularly excited about a new partnership we've established with a major shipping company, which has agreed to modify its routes to avoid our protected areas.

Finally, I'd like to say that while the situation is serious, it's not hopeless. Coral reefs have a remarkable ability to recover if we give them the chance. Our job is to buy them the time they need.

Qué es el Sentence completion y cómo se puntúa

Una sola persona habla durante 3 o 4 minutos: una charla, una presentación, alguien que cuenta en qué consiste su trabajo. Tienes 10 frases que resumen lo que dice, cada una con un hueco. Lo que falta casi siempre es un nombre, un número o dos o tres palabras que se oyen exactamente así.

Cada hueco vale 1 punto, así que esta tarea reparte 10 de los 30 puntos del Listening. Es la que más vale. Y la ortografía cuenta: una palabra bien oída y mal escrita no puntúa.

Los 3 errores que más puntos cuestan

  1. 1.Cambiar la palabra del audio por un sinónimo. Si ella dice bleaching, escribe bleaching: whitening no puntúa aunque signifique casi lo mismo.
  2. 2.Escribir algo que no encaja en la frase. Mira lo que hay antes y después del hueco: si delante pone A y detrás has agreed, falta un nombre en singular.
  3. 3.Quedarte atascado en un hueco. Las frases siguen el orden del audio; si una se te escapa, pasa a la siguiente y vuelve a ella en la segunda escucha.

Preguntas frecuentes

¿Cuántas palabras escribo en cada hueco?

Normalmente una, dos o tres. Si lo que vas a escribir es una frase entera, lo más probable es que hayas entendido mal la pregunta.

¿Los números se escriben con letras o con cifras?

Como prefieras: «12» y «twelve» valen lo mismo. Lo que importa es que esté bien escrito.

¿Cuenta la ortografía?

Sí. En el examen, una respuesta mal escrita es un fallo aunque la hayas oído bien. Por eso conviene hacer dictados cortos: escribir un minuto de audio palabra por palabra y compararlo con la transcripción.

Las otras tareas del Listening del B2 First

Sigue por aquí